Genetics, Identity, and Clinical Ethics under Conditions of Uncertainty

Genetics, Identity, and Clinical Ethics under Conditions of Uncertainty
In deep content, the research paper addresses how to integrate and understand scientific evidence arising from the growing body of genetic tests and genomic assessments in clinical practice. The paper addresses how to maintain genuine implications of genetic tests. The research brings into light that genuine results are those that highlight the potential benefits and risks of genomic medicine (Kaut 465). Honesty is crucial in the medical field since any ethical concern that arises from genetic material influences the medical results. For instance, it can influence how patients view themselves and how health experts counsel them.
Ultimately, the research provides bioethical issues emerging from the misuse, use, and under-comprehension of genomic medicine. In so doing, the research educates readers on how to maintain clinical ethics, identity, and genes under conditions of uncertainty (Trig Working Group 10). The increasing use of genomic medicine creates a strong need for clinicians to be properly equipped with information of how to access genetic based information. Indeed, it is true that advances in genomic information and medication raises ethical issues especially when clinician lacks adequate knowledge (Gelman 405). The physician should honestly explain to the patient the risks and benefits of genomic medicine. This would deter the misunderstanding of the health risks associated with the medicine. This research creates awareness that the principles of maintaining ethical issues in genomic medicine does not only protects patients, but also protect the integrity of the medical profession that foster trust between patients and health care providers. Therefore, if a physician lacks adequate information to inform the patient about the health implication of genomic medicine, it creates misunderstanding on whether the drug has health benefits and risks. As argued in the research paper, the health practitioner must consider the accuracy and reliability of the genetic test, the confounding environmental factors, and limited knowledge about gene mutation. It is important to provide meaningful information about the genetic results for patients.
After reading the research paper, it is evident that a lot needs to be done to improve genetics identity. Based on the conducted research, clinicians need to pay attention on the clinical ethics in genomic medicine. The research brings into attention that physicians in residency programs and medical schools lack practical training of genomics medicine. In the field of pathology, medical experts should be equipped with principles that govern quality control and assurance of quality health care. I would recommend many people to read this article to understand the important factors surrounding genomic medicine. Reading the article would create a strong ground where both clinicians and patients understand how to utilize genomic medicine. The health sector would also understand the importance of training clinicians on how to administer genomic treatment. From the ongoing discussion, it is evident that the article is excellent as it provides facts and ethical issues surrounding genomic medicine.

Works Cited
Gelman, Susan A. “Psychological essentialism in children.” Trends in cognitive sciences 8.9 (2004): 404-409.
Kaut, Kevin. “Counseling Psychology in the Era of Genetic Testing.” The Counseling Psychologist. 34.4 (2006): 461-488. Print.
Trig Working Group, ‘Lecture Materials from the TRIG Working Group: Training Residents in Genomics’, Publishing on the Internet, 2012, available HTTP: (accessed 11 July 2013).